Compliant isn't competitive

What evaluators actually reward when scoring complex tenders

If you’ve ever left a tender debrief hearing, “strong capability, but not enough evidence,” you know the frustration. It’s not that your team couldn’t deliver, it’s that your story didn’t translate into evaluation points.

In complex, multi-stream government and enterprise bids, the winners aren’t just compliant. They’re readable, defensible, and easy to mark. They guide assessors straight to the justification for full marks.

That’s not luck, it’s engineered.

At Tendup, we live and breathe the scoring logic. This is the secret weapon to turn expertise into top scores, and compliance into competitiveness.

What evaluation panels are trained to reward

A scoring matrix is commonly used to evaluate bids side by side. Here’s what the evaluators are looking for when they are completing this process.

1. Structure that maps clearly to criteria

Evaluators can only score what’s in the evaluation matrix. If they can’t easily locate an answer to stated criteria, the risk is that it gets missed. Create one sub-heading per sub-criterion and answer-first. Make sure you establish your response and then quantify it where possible. Add depth in appendices but don’t attach your marketing brochures – general content is frowned upon. 

2. Evidence, not assertion

Evaluators must score against criteria and record their reasons. That structure favours measurable outcomes over narrative claims. Think about your tender response as a persuasive piece that draws as many validating points as possible to make a pitch.

3. Maturity that builds delivery confidence

This point is key, particularly where you’re dealing with government or highly regulated industries. They are looking for maturity in your approach to risk and your ability to meet the delivery outcomes comfortably. Demonstrated experience is important here too. Make sure your case studies clearly reflect your ability to deliver in a similar company or industry.

4. Whole-of-life value (not just price)

Demonstrating the value for money that you can deliver over the life of a contract is a key criterion alongside price. In government procurement, value for money is an essential aspect of your pitch, and there will usually be a question on this.  It’s important to demonstrate how you’re managing TCO and commercial models that deliver outcomes over the contract life. Ensure that you surface assumptions and quantify operational impacts to your proposed activity.

A 4‑point self‑audit

Here’s a quick checklist for next time you’re completing a tender. Think about:

  • Evidence density (have you backed up your claims with as many quantifiable measures as you can?)
  • Evaluation ease (have you made it as easy as possible for the evaluation team to find your responses – clear mapping, scannable, table of contents, attachments guide, traceability matrix)
  • Delivery maturity (process, proven track record in governance and risk management, case studies that back this up)
  • Commercial clarity (clear view of TCO, assumptions/exclusions, explanation of your pricing and the value offered within it)

How Tendup helps

Tendup is a bid management consultancy with an expert team who manage complex tenders for government and enterprise. Our job is to turn your capability into compelling pitch with clear, well-presented, compliant response content. Our approach is evidence-engineered. We make sure your tender hits the right notes and then follows through by proving you’re the ideal tenderer. 

Want a quick read on your last bid? Got a loss review that you want to discuss? Book a 45minute analysis session. We’ll map your response to typical scoring logic and give you some guidance to move the dial on your next response. It’s a ‘get to know you’ discussion so it’s an obligation-free session. Interested? Get in touch today.

Some extra reading if you’d like to find out more about how bids are evaluated

NSW Government — Procurement Policy Framework https://www.procurepoint.nsw.gov.au/policy-and-reform/nsw-procurement-policy-framework

Department of Finance — Commonwealth Procurement Rules (CPRs)    https://www.finance.gov.au/government/procurement/commonwealth-procurement-rules

Digital Transformation Agency (DTA) — Digital Sourcing Framework    https://www.dta.gov.au/help-and-advice/digital-sourcing/digital-sourcing-framework

Scroll to Top